Kevin Tracy

What Happened To Drudge?

Posted By Kevin at 11:43 pm on January 5, 2009

There was a time years ago when the Drudge Report was actually the place I went in search of breaking news to write about. But sometime before the 2006 elections, the effort Matt Drudge has been putting forward has dropped so significantly that his website is now virtually useless to anybody with 5 minutes and an AM/FM radio or access to CNN Headline News.

What’s happened to the Drudge Report is rather symbolic of what’s happened to virtually all conservative media sources - they’ve simply stopped reporting news. As bad as the Drudge Report has become, Fox News Channel has gone down an equally slippery slope spending most of their time competing with smut celebrity news and their quest for the next OJ Simpson “Trial of the Century.” And what little political news they do report is empty headlines of things we’ve already known for weeks.

Chip Saltsman, Ken Blackwell, and a few of the other RNC Chairman candidates said we’ve failed to communicate our message to voters over the last three or four years. What they didn’t talk much about is why we’ve been so terrible at it. And it’s for this very reason. The conservative news outlets have quit reporting news relevant to conservative and moderate Republicans. Think about it, a British girl of British parents can go missing in Portugal - an event that has literally nothing to do with Americans - and yet it gets more media attention than a serious nation-wide campaign to reform our tax system or the debate over our jackass cable companies and ISPs threatening to eliminate user freedom on the Internet. If these huge issues can’t get an hour of airtime, how in the world were Republicans like Luke Puckett, Mike Sodrel, and Elisabeth Dole supposed to get their message out?

While it’s my honest opinion that CNN has significantly toned down their liberal rhetoric, there’s no denying that the liberal media is still beating us senseless. So when popular conservative-leaning services like the Drudge Report and Fox News fail to provide balance in the national debate, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that nobody trusts us anymore.

Even Mike Huckabee on Fox News has failed to inspire me to change my opinion about the network. His weekend show has become a sort of Christian “The View” with very little time being given to discuss politics after the “feel good” and “Smut Lite” segments. I know there are people in the Christian Right who love this show, but for a secular-minded liberal like myself who just so happens to agree with conservative philosophies, it’s political torture.

Yeah, go ahead and say I’m wrong. But most moderates and Reagan Democrats feel the same way I do about both smut news networks, the only difference is that I’m a Republican in philosophy and they’re Democrats. With no reason to vote Republican, they’ll vote Democrat every time.

Anyway, back to the original purpose of this blog post. If anybody gets their conservative political news from a more reliable Drudge-like source, feel free to share it in the comments. I’ve been using Indian, Russian, British, and Japanese news services for headlines, but I can’t publish that much anti-Bush rhetoric on my blog without losing readers.

Other posts covering similar themes:

Why I Don’t Watch FoxNews (March 18, 2008)
Republican Stereotypes (September 26, 2007)
Huckabee Leads In Iowa!!! (November 28, 2007)
Ron Paul Supporters Should Consider Voting Huckabee (February 9, 2008)
CENSORED BY JOE DONNELLY! Luke Puckett Embarasses Opponent in Final Debate (October 31, 2008)

Analysis of the RNC Chairman Debate

Posted By Kevin at 4:37 pm on

I almost hate to split the healthy discussion we’re having in the previous post’s comments section, but I just wanted to throw my analysis out there beyond the live blogging. I’m just going to give my impressions of the candidates from left to right and anything beyond that we can get into in the comments section.

Mike Steele
I’ve never said that Mike Steele wasn’t an excellent communicator and he exhibited today exactly why I refuse to suggest anything like that. With a couple of exceptions, Steele answered all the questions in a way that will surely please the grassroots supporters. If I were a Steele supporter, my only concern would have been that he spent too much time pandering to the base and not enough to the RNC members who will actually be electing the next Chairman. While I personally don’t think Steele is qualified for this post, he didn’t give anybody a reason not to support him. I don’t know if you noticed, but he spent a lot of time wringing his hands. If you haven’t noticed before, Steele communicates with hand gestures when he’s improvising.

Katon Dawson
Let me start off by saying that I like Ed Gillespie, the RNC chairman before the 2004 election. But for those of you who know who I’m talking about, Gillespie looked like somebody who got picked on a lot as a schoolboy. That said, Gillespie was a fiery leader and behaved himself as such. This is my first time watching Dawson at any length of time and it appears the exact opposite is true of him. He looks like your run-of-the-mill State Republican Chairman, but he behaved himself like a weak nerd. He was not a strong presence on the debate floor, which is why he stood up to talk (to make himself look bigger). Unfortunately for him, it didn’t work. I was left dangerously uninspired by Dawson.

Ken Blackwell
The more I learn about Blackwell, the more I’m inspired by him. I’m still backing Chip Saltsman, but Blackwell is my second choice. I was impressed with his willingness to call for open revolt against the establishment within the grassroots. He’s truly a Republican after my own heart. Blackwell’s opponents will say that he’s playing power games to garner support. That’s part of this game though. You build a strong base of support, as both Chip and Blackwell have done, and you use them as surrogates as people drop out during the ballot process. Believe it or not, but that’s very similar to how our Constitution was drafted.

Saul Anuzis
Although Mitt Romney hasn’t officially endorsed a candidate, I have a feeling Saul is Mitt’s man. You wouldn’t know it because Saul doesn’t have fancy-man hair. But Saul supported Mitt in the primaries and from what friends in Michigan tell me, he operates a lot like him. Most telling was towards the end of the debate when he was asked when he’s stood up to Republicans in his state. He completely failed to give an example, rather just opting to tell how he helped Republicans vote against Democrats on several matters. Not exactly the kind of guy we want moving into the RNC Chairman’s office.

Chip Saltsman
This is probably the most media time Chip has had since the State Income Tax revolt in Tennessee several years ago. Chip’s best moment was talking about how he stood up to the Republican Governor of the state on that very issue. I personally suggest that Chip’s people get video of him on the State Capital Building’s steps out to the blogs immediately because, as my memory recalls, there were some pretty impressive images portrayed there that I’m sure we would all love to be reminded of. The parallels to that situation and the current state of the Republican Party are pretty remarkable too.

Mike Duncan
Duncan is the current RNC Chairman and I thought he came across as a hybrid of all the worst features of Fred Thompson and John McCain. I’ve never seen a man so out of touch in my entire life. Duncan was the personification of everything that’s wrong with the Republican Party today. Aside from the lightning rounds, every time Duncan spoke, I could feel my blood pressure rise and he would say something that would cause me to shout, “that’s exactly what the problem is!” All of the problem questions posed to the candidates have gotten worse under Duncan and he’s the last person I would trust to lead us out of this situation. Duncan had no place on that stage and he has a lot of balls running for re-election. I think he knows he won’t win, which leads me to believe he’s staying in to throw his support behind someone else. He’s insulted Chip, has been insulted by Steele, and Saul is a long shot candidate beyond measure; so while I hope it’s Blackwell, odds are more likely that Duncan will support Katon Dawson. If you pay close attention, you’ll notice that Dawson and Duncan had eerily similar answers to all of the questions.

KTracy.com Candidate Performance Ranking
1. Tie - Chip Saltsman and Ken Blackwell
3. Mike Steele
4. Saul Anuzis
5. Katon Dawson
6. Mike Duncan

Other posts covering similar themes:

Live Blogging of the RNC Chairman Debate (January 5, 2009)
Choose Your Chairman! Vote For Chip Saltsman! (December 22, 2008)
Bill Frist Joins “Draft Chip Saltsman For RNC Chairman” (November 6, 2008)
Mike Steele Enters Race For RNC Chairman (November 12, 2008)
Don’t Jump On Mike Steele’s Bandwagon (January 1, 2009)

Live Blogging of the RNC Chairman Debate

Posted By Kevin at 1:09 pm on

1:30 - End of Debate, the video will be posted on YouTube later this evening.

1:27 - Anuzis says we need to win back Reagan Democrats.

1:26 - Blackwell is selling his plan again. Says the grassroots need to “Revolt” against the establishment in the party. (very bold)

1:25 - Dawson is standing up again… he still looks foolish.

1:24 - Steele said he was inspired by “the rhetoric” of Lincoln, Roosevelt, and Reagan.

1:23 - We’re not doing good because I don’t have anyone being involved with the RNC to hold us accountable.

1:22 - Chip goes first. This debate is not about the party, it’s about the country. There’s not a perfect candidate on the stage, including himself. Our job is to win elections, beat democrats, talk about the platform… not about personalities. (Hit on Steele and Obama).

1:21 - Closing Comments

1:19 - Q: Would you support the bailout? Dawson yes… everybody else no.

1:17 - There’s been a long discussion about their internet followers…

1:15 - Lightning round: Favorite political website? Blackwell was the only one to not give his own website or a party website. Blackwell gave townhall.com.

1:14 - Blackwell is selling his plan… I’ll link to it later. Says the RNC should match 10% of all money raised by state and territory parties.

1:13 - Dawson says we must be ready to win in 2010… isn’t really offering specifics, just naming names.

1:12 - Steele says boots on the ground aren’t enough, going after Duncan a bit. Steele complimented Chip.

1:11 - Duncan says he wants to nominate candidates in all 50 states, but that he won’t commit to a 50 state strategy.

1:10 - Chip says yes, but he calls it a “Blue State Strategy” to ask state chairmen, “what do you need to win?”

1:10 - Q: Will you support a 50 state strategy?

1:09 - Q: Will you encourage Republicans to sign the “no new taxes” pledge? All said yes.

1:08 - Fought Democrats (not Republicans) on cigarette taxes in South Carolina.

1:07 - Steele attacked the President after Katrina.

1:06 - Duncan said he stood up to earmarks… wow.

1:05 - Chip said he stood up against the Governor of Tennessee on the state income tax… AND WON!

1:04 - Anuzis says hypocrisy has killed our party. Said Republicans didn’t vote with Democrats in Michigan.

1:03 - Blackwell failed to give specifics.

1:02 - Q: When have you stood up against Republicans in your state?

1:00 - Steele, “When did we start talking about this? When are we going to do something?” Let the state chairmen do something.

12:59 - Duncan doesn’t seem to realize this problem has gotten worse since he became Chairman. He’s not even talking about the question.

12:58 - Chip says we haven’t been able to communicate ANY message to minorities communities and ALL communities.

12:57 - Anuzis says we’re not friendly to minorities.

12:55 - Blackwell says this is a party of inclusion, but that we’re a country of laws. We need to convince Democrats that Unions are bad for them, especially in schools. “Grow a new electorate.”

12:55 - Dawson says we need to recruit and elect more Hispanics and Asian Americans.

12:54 - Q: How do we bring Hispanics back into the GOP?

12:53 - Duncan said he welcomed Ron Paul and his supporters to the Republican National Convention.

12:51 - Acknowledged that they shared office space in Des Moines… didn’t mention that they raided the Huckabee space and got arrested… Chip is the first one to refer to Ron Paul as “Dr. Paul.”

12:51 - Anuzis said he’s helping Ron Paul supporters run for office in Michigan.

12:50 - Blackwell says we’re a federation of different groups. Both sides need to be less “purist.” Blackwell is doing well.

12:49 - Dawson liked their passion. We need to become a party of addition, not subtraction.

12:48 - Steele is sucking up to Ron Paul. Acknowledges that there will be disagreements. Doesn’t understand that they are purists.

12:47 - Q: How do we keep Ron Paul Republicans involved?

12:47 - Q: What was our biggest problem? All common sense answers.

12:46 - Lightning Round: Are you pro-life and do you support parental notification? All said Yes.

12:44 - Chip was by far the best spoken of the “capitalize on over-reaching Democrats” guys.

12:43 - Saul Anuzis says we should be prepared to capitalize on the impending expansion of government. He and Dawson say Governors races are more important than Congressional Races.

12:42 - Blackwell says we must set the agenda, not the Democrats. But if we can’t be prepared to respond to the Democrats more effectively. Blackwell went back to technology.

12:41 - Steele says we should just rally around the existing platform. Suggesting personal responsibility.

10:40 - Duncan says we need to unite against Obama’s tax hikes for the bailout and the Fairness Doctrine.

12:39 - Q: Democrats were able to rally around Iraq. What can Republicans rally around in the future?

10:38 - Saul suggests we continue building networks.

12:36 - Ken Blackwell says we should throw more money at it. Integrate regular operations with the e-campaign and create an Technology Chief in the RNC. Make it high-tech and high-touch (make everyone able to use it).

12:35 - Mike Duncan doesn’t seem to understand what “Open Source” is… thinks it’s buying online ads.

12:34 - Chip says GOP has taken the approach that technology in a campaign is collecting e-mail addresses to SPAM supporters.

12:33 - Q: How do we use technology?

12:32 - Q: How many guns do you own? Chip and Blackwell own small weapons caches.

12:31 - Q: Lightning Round: Who is your LEAST favorite GOP President? Chip, don’t have one, worst Republican beats the best Democrat every time. Harding was also mentioned.

12:30 - Q: Lightning Round: Who is your favorite GOP President. Everyone says Reagan.

12:29 - Katon Dawson is sucking.

12:28 - Steele said we need to get face time with young voters, YouTube and Twitter is not nearly enough.

12:26 - Chip says we should ban the “You are the future of the party” phrase and tell them, “You are the heart and soul of the party.” College Republicans and young supporters do most of the work. Said he was a teen when he became a Republican, citing Reagan.

12:24 - Ken Blackwell was the first to mention RebuildTheParty.com. Wants to make the College Republicans, part of the formal discussion.

12:23 - Q: How do we reach out to 18-25 year old voters?

12:21 - Chip had another good analogy, “We’ve been electing rodent control officers and the constituents are the rodents.” In other words, we need to elect people who truly represent us, not simply pacify us.

12:20 - Saul’s microphone is still shot.

12:18 - Blackwell had a good analogy. “Our candidates have either run a campaign like Jimmy Carter and then govern like Jimmy Carter or they’ve campaigned like Ronald Reagan and they govern like Jimmy Carter.”

12:17 - Q: What should the RNC do to ensure that our next majority will limit government and not expand it like we did last time?

12:14 - Mike Duncan is saying he’s proud of what we accomplished in 2008. The guy is promising that he won’t run the RNC like he’s run the RNC.

12:13 - GO CHIP! Chip Saltsman is giving his long list of impressive credentials. Is the first one to talk about tax reform at an event hosted by Americans for Tax Reform.

12:12 - Saul Anuzis doesn’t know how to wear a microphone.

12:11 - Dawson just got slapped by Blackwell, sarcastically remarking, “We all know how difficult it is to win elections in that swing state of South Carolina.

12:07 - Katon Dawson stood up during his 2 minute introduction. Steele and Blackwell are sitting, making Dawson look like a nerd.

12:02 - Candidates are sitting in comfortable looking chairs, from left to right: Mike Steele, Katon Dawson, Ken Blackwell, Saul Anuzis (Romney guy) , Chip Saltsman, and Mike Duncan. Each of the questions will be 1 minute long until a 1 word lightning round at the end.

Other posts covering similar themes:

Analysis of the RNC Chairman Debate (January 5, 2009)
Mike Steele Enters Race For RNC Chairman (November 12, 2008)
Choose Your Chairman! Vote For Chip Saltsman! (December 22, 2008)
Don’t Jump On Mike Steele’s Bandwagon (January 1, 2009)
A Relentless Defense of Chip Saltsman (January 3, 2009)

RNC Chairman Debate and the new face of the DNC

Posted By Kevin at 12:55 pm on

I’m sitting in front of a 60 inch television in glorious 7.1 surround sound with a 6 pack of Diet Coke on the table next to my Mac iBook. You might expect the TV to be on ESPN or ESPN2 for a big Bowl Game. If I were a Democrat, you might expect the TV to be on the G4 Network, which is doing live coverage of an Adult Film Expo. Surely then, I must be watching Speed Racer or some other jaw dropping Hollywood blockbuster. But no.

No, I’m watching C-SPAN2, anxiously awaiting the hour-long RNC Chairman Debate starting in 15 minutes. Republicans are just weeks away from learning who their new leader will be and this is one of the few chances we’re going to get to hear from the candidates outside of conference calls and online interviews. The Mac is here to provide live blogging coverage of the event for those of you who are afraid of becoming addicted to C-SPAN.

Before the event begins, I wanted to comment quickly on President-Elect Obama’s choice of Virginia’s Governor Kane as temporary DNC Chairman. Assuming Obama follows Presidential tradition, Obama will either pick Kane to permanently fill Howard Dean’s post or appoint a carefully selected adviser from his campaign.

But are Democrats best served by this? It seems to me that the voting members of the DNC did a damn good job electing Howard Dean to the post in 2001 and taking it out of their hands, tradition or not, is a shoddy practice. Of course, I’m not complaining as a conservative who wants to see the Democrats in decline as soon as possible. But as an observer of the political process, I have to question the logic of the move. After all, President Bush has picked a number of losers to the position and that’s part of the reason we’re in the horrific political position that we’re in.

If any of you are watching C-SPAN2 at the moment, you’ll get a good look at the Vice President of Sudan. He’s wearing a purple suit with an over-sized black cowboy hat. Ahh! C-SPAN is seriously political heroin.


This video doesn’t do justice to the vibrant purple of this suit.

Other posts covering similar themes:

Is the Bill Richardson Endorsement the Beginning of the End for the Clinton Era? (March 21, 2008)
Howard Dean: The Left Guy at the Left Time (September 20, 2007)
Race for RNC Chairman Starts Early… Too Early (October 17, 2008)
Clinton Back On Top According to Gallup, Could She Still Pull It Off? (April 20, 2008)
Candidates Snub RNC Fundraiser (October 17, 2007)

Russian Navy Goes Global

Posted By Kevin at 12:37 pm on

Earlier today, leaders in the Russian military approved a Naval plan to permanently station warships at ports in Russian-friendly countries around the world, especially in Africa. There are several reasons the Russian Federation is going down this road, but certainly not the least of which is to raise the blood pressure of Red-Scare conservatives here in the United States.

But in addition to putting their finger in our face and saying, “I’m not touching you, I’m not touching you,” there are practical purposes for the move.

First and foremost, sending Russian ships to foreign ports is a form of diplomacy, not unlike the United States maintaining military presences in Europe and Asia 60 years after WWII and nearly 20 years after the Cold War. In addition to putting military diplomats on foreign soil, the additional sailors are an economic stimulus to the communities they’ll be stationed in.

This also gives the military an excuse to send additional funding to the horrifically underfunded (until now) Russian Navy.

The expanded global presence of the Russian Navy is also their way of promising military support to any country they’re stationed in. The military exercises they will undoubtedly conduct with host countries will strengthen military ties and give their Navy even more training to make up for the lack of activity since the fall of the Soviet Union.

And although the media tells us in the west that everything Russia does is for Russia and that only the United States can do good deeds with their military, the Russian Navy is actually contributing to international commercial maritime security as they’ve taken up the fight against pirates around the Horn of Africa (Somalia) and Southeast Asia.

Other posts covering similar themes:

Can Russia Help The US Out of Economic Crisis? (July 10, 2008)
PALIN Threatens War With Russia! (September 11, 2008)
Putin: Person of the Year! (December 19, 2007)
US Needs To Stop Bashing Russia Over Georgian Crisis (August 11, 2008)
Russia Can’t Be Allowed To Overthrow Tbilisi… but what options do we have? (August 11, 2008)

A Relentless Defense of Chip Saltsman

Posted By Kevin at 1:48 am on January 3, 2009

Chip Saltsman Goes Hunting

Are You Too Cowardly To Support Chip Saltsman?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

As most of you have probably heard by now, Chip Saltsman created a bit of a stir over the Christmas holiday by sending Paul Shanklin’s latest CD to the members of the RNC as a fun present. When I first heard this, I half expected Republicans to be outraged because the RNC Chairman candidates agreed on a $5 spending limit. Like many of you, I was left in dismay when I found out the cause of the great sensation was a track on the CD titled “Barack the Magic Negro.” Which is actually named after this liberal LA Times column in March 2008. Unlike you, however, my dismay didn’t stem from Saltsman’s gift.

No, I was left shocked and appalled by the reaction of rank and file members of the Republican Party. When I joined the Republican Party in 1999, I joined a movement that was outraged by the insane double standards used by the media to discredit the conservative movement. Had this happened 10 years ago, Republicans from all walks of life would have rallied behind Chip Saltsman. Instead, just one week after this became sensationalized, Republicans are jumping ship and abandoning a guy who did nothing wrong besides send a CD of political parodies, written by a relatively famous and well respected conservative, to members of the RNC.

What’s worse is that nobody actually believes Chip Saltsman is a racist. Even Michael Steele and Ken Blackwell, the two African-Americans running for the same position, admit that. Yet still, there are one-time Saltsman supporters in the grassroots who are running like cowards, disavowing a man who led the Tennessee Republican Party out of a black hole of political irrelevancy and then repeated the task by propelling Mike Huckabee into the mainstream with a nearly flawless strategy. Three weeks ago, most of us agreed that Chip Saltsman was a political mastermind who had the strongest and most detailed plan for restoring the Republican Party and, just as importantly, a record to back it up.

Nothing has changed except for a parody CD which liberals and shameless Republicans wanted to make into a baseless and irrelevant issue for their own political convince. If you honestly believe caving to this kind of ridiculous rhetoric is going to restore the Republican Party, then you truly deserve a defunct political party.

If you’re anything like me, however, you remember a time before the Republican Party was castrated; when Republicans stood up for one another and the issues they believed in. Chip Saltsman is the most qualified candidate to restore the Republican Party to that great era. Without Chip Saltsman as RNC Chairman, the overwhelming odds are that we’re going to remain a castrated party led by cowards with no backbone until it comes to cold fundraising calls and 12th hour campaign ads. And if that’s the direction you choose to send the Republican Party, then I am obviously no longer a Republican.

The Republican Party is in desperate need of serious and drastic reform in more ways than we can count. If that requires us to send a man with a sense of humor (God forbid) to lead the RNC, the that’s what we need to make happen. Chip Saltsman is a good, hard working, intelligent man whose experience far exceeds that which should be expected of any RNC Chairman and everybody reading this knows that.

Do the right thing. Defend Chip Saltsman.

Other posts covering similar themes:

Huckabee Gearing Up To Support Chip Saltsman (November 12, 2008)
Bill Frist Joins “Draft Chip Saltsman For RNC Chairman” (November 6, 2008)
ChipSaltsman.com is Online! (December 8, 2008)
Red State Offers More Praise for Chip Saltsman (November 7, 2008)
Choose Your Chairman! Vote For Chip Saltsman! (December 22, 2008)

Russians Don’t Think Obama Can Unite America

Posted By Kevin at 12:26 pm on January 2, 2009

President-Elect Barack Obama campaigned long and hard trying to sell the idea that he would reunite the country if he was elected President of the United States. To the dismay and horror of many conservatives, Obama sold the American people and they gave him the opportunity in November of last year. According to a recent AP poll, nearly 70% of Americans are confident that Obama will be successful in that effort.

Igor PanarinBut Igor Panarin, a Russian academic and expert on American politics, thinks differently. Very differently. Panarin has proposed a radical theory that’s taking Moscow elite and common folk alike by storm. He predicts that Obama will not only fail to bring this country back together, but actually be president as the United States of America dissolves and splinters into several regional nations.

As ridiculous as it may seem, it is worth our time to go into Panarin’s rationale for such an unusual prediction. At the heart of the troubles is the global economic recession, which it’s worth noting that Russia blames completely on the United States. As the recession gets worse, Panarin believes wealthier states will begin witholding tax dollars from the Federal Government. In other words, a wealthy state like California that has serious budget problems may attempt to take federal taxes from their state and put them directly into the state treasury to help curtail their own budget shortfalls. If this is possible (a subject of debate), poorer states will obviously protest and send America into a second civil war.

Panarin predicts that we have until 2010 before the collapse of the government.

After the collapse, Alaska will be left almost entirely isolated and, he believes, will be annexed back to Russia; giving Sarah Palin the foreign policy experience she so desperately needed. Other parts of the country would be annexed to Canada.

Could the United States be on the brink of collapse in the next few years?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Yes, this seems rather trivial and even laughable. But in theory, assuming politicians did what was best for their state, it would make sense. We’ve discussed in length the atrocious spending of the US Federal Government and we sat appalled as Republicans and Democrats alike voted to bailout banks, investment firms, and other corporations with shoddy business practices and mind blowing numbers of lobbyists. A wealthy state with financial troubles could very easily come to the conclusion that they could spend those billions of dollars a lot more efficiently than the Federal Government.

If this sounds familiar, it’s because it was part of the Republican Platform before the Republicans abandoned their platform. We believe that individuals could spend money better than governments, and that people had more control over government when local governments have more power than the Federal Government. The state government is more local than the national government, and thus can better spend our tax dollars than the Federal Government.

Of course, for Panarin’s prediction to work, California liberals would have to acknowledge that local control of money is better than the federal control of money, which is contrary to the fundamentals they’ve operated on for most of their careers. It also assumes that liberals would be willing to fight for money. It also assumes that liberals have access to weapons after they’ve legislated their 2nd Amendment Rights away.

Personally, I see this as little more than a publicity stunt that feeds off anti-US sentiment in the United States created by an arrogant foreign policy by the Bush Administration and, in particular, the State Department under Secretary Rice. Interestingly though, this serves as evidence for two points I’ve tried to make on this blog through the years.

1. Republicans and Russians have a lot more in common than we like to think.
2. Russia has a capitalist media driven by public demand… just like us.

Other posts covering similar themes:

At What Point Do We Resort To Tax Evasion? (September 25, 2008)
Mongolia defies geography, builds military alliance with the United States (March 10, 2008)
North Carolina GOP Snubs McCain, Attacks Obama and NC Democrats (April 26, 2008)
Happy Birthday Prime Minister Putin! (October 7, 2008)
US Needs To Stop Bashing Russia Over Georgian Crisis (August 11, 2008)

Is Hamas A Legitimate Government?

Posted By Kevin at 4:59 pm on January 1, 2009

HAMAS logoIn a recent blog post, Governor Huckabee writes about the ongoing situation in Israel, one of the few foreign policy issues he’s actually well versed on. However, early in the post, he writes “Here is the simple picture: Hamas is not a legitimate government, but a terrorist organization.” How true is that?

Well, Hamas isn’t a “government” anymore than the Democratic Party. So that’s technically true, but is Hamas a legitimate political entity within the Palestinian Government? Governor Mike Huckabee, like most Americans, will tell you plainly, “No.” But perhaps people who have already committed to this position should reopen their minds to the possibility. Hamas was elected in verified and legitimate democratic elections in 2005, elections which were backed by both the United States and Israel. By saying Hamas isn’t a legitimate political force, we’re telling the world that we only support democracy when the people elect people who agree with us.

If the Palestinian voters chose to be represented by a terrorist organization, that’s their choice to make. And whether we like it or not, Hamas is their legitimate voice and if we want to deal with the Palestinian people, we have to deal with Hamas (and war is a form of negotiation).

So we know a terrorist organization can become a legitimate force in a democratic government. But once it does, is that terrorist organization, in this case Hamas, remain a terrorist organization? The United States defines terrorism as “premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents.” So is Hamas a subnational group? As the leaders of the Palestinian Government, they’ve legitimized the armed wings of their organization and incorporated them into the government. So they are not subgovernment.

But subnational? Well that depends on our interpretation of the Israel-Palestine situation in the Middle East. Although Palestine is not a recognized country by the United States, the Palestinian Government is recognized and while US foreign policy has shifted around a lot in the last two or three decades, one constant has been our belief in a 2-State solution that would recognize an independent Palestine.

In other words, our national policy towards Palestine makes Hamas not a terrorist organization.

If I were Governor Huckabee, I’d have probably just said that Hamas was group of terrible men and women dead set on killing innocent people.

Other posts covering similar themes:

McCain Flip-Flopped on Negotiating with HAMAS (May 17, 2008)
The Night the Lights went out in Gaza (October 29, 2007)
Giving President Carter Credit Where Credit Is Due (April 22, 2008)
Will Radical Islam Prevail in Gaza? (June 14, 2007)
Barack Obama is right on foreign policy (May 20, 2008)

Don’t Jump On Mike Steele’s Bandwagon

Posted By Kevin at 3:50 am on

Mike SteeleChip Saltsman has had a difficult week after absurd attacks by liberal Democrats and shameless Republicans and it’s caused a few individuals (without naming names) to think about ditching Saltsman for Mike Steele, who is doing the right thing and backing Saltsman up.

It goes without saying that Maryland’s former Lt. Governor and 2006 GOP Senate Candidate, Mike Steele, is a very articulate orator who believes solidly in Republican principles. After Chip Saltsman, I know the most about Mike Steele and I can’t imagine him being anything other than a stand up guy, which is why I thought Steele should have been given the RNC Chairmanship in 2007 after narrowly losing a race for United States Senate in Maryland the previous November.

However, two years later, I must advise that you think twice before backing Steele for RNC Chairman, even if you’re not a fan of Chip Saltsman. The reason not being Steele’s character, but rather his inept leadership of GOPAC. Throughout the 1980s, 90s, and the first few years after the turn of the millennium, GOPAC was one of the most influential and well-managed conservative political action committees in the nation.

Since Steele became Chairman, GOPAC has spent $1.4 million on administrative costs alone while contributing less than $35,000 to Republican candidates and parties across the country. For those of you that don’t like math, GOPAC pays it’s top administrators $40 for every $1 they give to all the federal and non-federal candidates and parties they contribute to. It’s more absurd than a three legged giraffe on roller blades and it’s an insult to everybody who has given money to GOPAC under Mike Steele’s leadership.

What’s worse is that this only begins to scrape the surface of all the problems with GOPAC under Steele.

While I certainly don’t mean to accuse Mike Steele of cronyism, his Chairmanship of GOPAC has proven he’s completely incompetent to do anything about it. And with the Republican Party suffering so terribly by the actions of corrupt and power hungry individuals in our leadership, we need a leader who is ready to audit the entire party process on day one and tackle the roadblocks. Mike Steele simply isn’t that guy.

Now, Steele gives a great speech, most of us witnessed that at last years Republican National Convention. So there’s no doubt in my mind that Steele has a role in rebuilding the Republican Party and welcoming new people to the base of the party. But the role of our major National Party Chairmen has never been to spend all his time reaching out to voters, giving speeches to high schools, and recruiting new supporters. The job of the Chairmen is to ensure that the party has thousands of leaders able to do that same job with the ultimate goal of electing Republicans and strengthening the party, not enriching the pockets of its top administrators.

Steele’s leadership, or rather, lack of leadership of GOPAC has proven, beyond a doubt, that he is unable to perform the job of RNC Chairman as we need it to be performed in this political environment.

I’m supporting Chip Saltsman, but if he’s not the guy for you, there are nearly a dozen other candidates to pick from, most of which would make a better RNC Chairman than Mike Steele.

Other posts covering similar themes:

Mike Steele Enters Race For RNC Chairman (November 12, 2008)
Choose Your Chairman! Vote For Chip Saltsman! (December 22, 2008)
Huckabee Gearing Up To Support Chip Saltsman (November 12, 2008)
ChipSaltsman.com is Online! (December 8, 2008)
Bill Frist Joins “Draft Chip Saltsman For RNC Chairman” (November 6, 2008)

Older Posts »
Facebook YouTube My Space Flickr Twitter Zannel Digg KTracy.com RSS Feed

Powered by WordPress